|
by Ajaan Lee Dhammadharo Translated from the
Thai by Thanissaro Bhikkhu
|
Translator's note: This is one of
Ajaan Lee's few tape recorded talks, dating from October
4, 1960, just six months before he passed away. In the
talk, he covers the eight classical forms of knowledge
and skill (vijja) that come from the practice of
concentration, discussing how they relate to the methods
of science and other forms of worldly knowledge. Three
of the knowledges toward the end of the list are barely
touched on, and the end of the talk is fairly abrupt.
This may have been due to the tape's running out, for he
had quite a lot to say on these knowledges in his other
talks and writings. Still, the heart of the talk — the
role of thinking and not-thinking in developing
concentration and liberating insight — is discussed in
considerable detail, making this an extremely helpful
guide to the "how" of concentration and insight
practice.`
|
Vijja-carana-sampanno:
Consummate in knowledge & conduct. |
I'm going to talk about knowledge — the highest level
of knowledge, not ordinary knowledge. Ordinary knowledge is
adulterated with a lot of defilements and mental fermentations,
and so it's called hethima-vijja, lower knowledge. Lower
knowledge is something everyone has, Buddhist and non-Buddhist
alike: the various branches of worldly knowledge that people
study from textbooks so as to run their societies and administer
their nations. And then there are the special branches of
knowledge, the scientific ways of thinking that people use to
invent all sorts of amazing contraptions for the human race —
things like clairvoyance (television), clairaudience
(telephones), and powers of levitation (airplanes). They've
gotten to the point where these contraptions can work in place
of people. During the last war, for instance, I heard that they
were able to drop bombs on other countries without sending
people along with them. With a push of a button they could tell
the missile where to go, what to do, and when it had finished
the job to their satisfaction, have it come back home. This is
what's called progress in worldly knowledge — or lokiya vijja.
This kind of knowledge is common all over the world, and falls
into the two sorts that I've mentioned: the sort that comes from
studying books (sutamaya-pañña), and the sort that comes from
thinking things through, or cintamaya-pañña.
This second kind of knowledge arises within the mind itself.
People with a lot of education in the theoretical sciences work
with their thinking. They think to the point where an idea
appears as a picture in the mind, like an uggaha-nimitta
(spontaneous image). When the picture appears in the mind, they
may sketch it down on paper, and then experiment with physical
objects to see if it works. If it doesn't work, they make
adjustments, creating a new idea from their old idea — adjusting
it a bit here, expanding it a bit there — keeping at it until
they find what works in line with their aims.
If we think about this on a shallow level, it's really
amazing. But if we think a little bit deeper, it's not so
amazing at all. They take their starting point with something
really simple: for example, how to make a small person large, or
a large person small — something really, really simple. Then
they take a mirror and bend it in, so that a tall person will
turn into a small person. They bend it out, so that a small
person will become tall. That's all to begin with. Then they
keep thinking along these lines until they can take a faraway
object and make it appear up close. The people who get these
things started tend to be military strategists. They're the ones
who usually get these ideas first. Another important branch of
science is medicine. People in both these branches have to think
deeper than people in general.
For example, people in ships out at sea got it into their
heads that they'd like to see the ships approaching them from a
distance. "How can we see them? How can we get their image to
appear in our ship?" They worked on this idea until they
succeeded. First they started out really simple-minded, just
like us. Simple-minded in what way? They thought like a mirror,
that's all, nothing special. They put a mirror up high on a mast
and then had a series of mirrors pick up the image in the first
mirror and send it on down into the ship. They didn't have to
look in the first mirror. They could look at a little tiny
mirror down in the ship and see ships approaching from far away.
That's all they used in the beginning. After a while they made a
single mirror in waves. When an image hit the top wave, the next
wave picked it up and sent it on down the waves of the mirror
into the ship. They kept thinking about this until now, no more:
They have radar, a tiny little box that doesn't use a series of
mirrors, and doesn't use a mirror in waves, but can still pull
the image of a faraway ship and make it appear in your ship.
This is how knowledge develops to a high level in the sciences.
As for medicine, doctors these days are researching into how
they can keep people from dying. Lots of people are doing the
research, but no one has found the solution. No matter how much
research they do, people are still dying. They haven't succeeded
in making people live longer than their ordinary span. This is
another branch of knowledge that comes from thinking, and not
from textbooks.
And there's still another branch that's moving even further
out, but how far they'll get is hard to say. These are the
people who want to go and live on Mars. It must be really nice
up there. But the chances of their succeeding are small. Why are
they small? Because the people aren't really sincere. And why
aren't they sincere? Because they're still unsure and uncertain.
The idea isn't really clear in their heads. This uncertainty is
what gets in the way of success.
So this is the second level of worldly knowledge, the level
that comes from thinking and ideas, or cintamaya-pañña.
But in the final analysis, neither of these two levels
of knowledge can take us beyond suffering and stress. They're
the type of knowledge that creates bad kamma about 70 percent of
the time. Only 30 percent of the time do they actually benefit
the human race. Why only 30 percent? If another war gets
started: total disaster. The kinds of knowledge that are really
useful, that give convenience to human transportation and
communication, are few and far between. For the most part,
worldly knowledge is aimed at massive killing, at amassing power
and influence. That's why it doesn't lead beyond suffering and
stress, doesn't lead beyond birth, aging, illness, and death.
Take, for instance, the countries at present that are clever
in building all kinds of weapons. They sell their weapons to
other countries, and sometimes those other countries use the
weapons to kill people in the countries that built them. There
are countries that can't build their own weapons, yet they
declare war on the countries who gave them military aid. That's
about as far as the results of worldly knowledge can take you.
This is why the Buddha taught us a higher level of knowledge:
Dhamma knowledge. Dhamma knowledge arises in two ways, through
thinking and through not thinking. The first level of thinking
is called appropriate attention (yoniso manasikara). When we
hear the Dhamma, we have to use appropriate attention to
consider things before we're asked to believe them. For
instance, suppose we want to make merit. We simply hear the word
"merit" and we want some, but usually without stopping to think
about what sorts of things are appropriate to give as donations,
and what sorts of people are appropriate to receive our
meritorious offerings. You have to consider things carefully:
consider yourself, then consider the object you want to give,
and then consider the recipient of the object, to see if all
these things go together. Even if they don't, you can still go
ahead and give the object, of course, but it's best that you
know what you're doing, that you're not acting out of delusion,
not simply acting out of desire. If you want merit and simply
act without giving appropriate attention to things, you're
lacking the kind of discernment that comes from thinking,
cintamaya-pañña. You have to reflect on things on many levels if
you want your act of merit-making to lead to purity. This is
called doing good based on discernment. This is what's meant by
kusala dhamma, the quality of skillfulness. Kusala dhamma is a
name for discernment, but we usually don't translate that way in
Thai. We think of kusala as just another word for merit.
Actually, kusala can be a noun, and it can also be an adjective.
As a noun, it means the demeanor by which a person acts in good
ways, in body, speech, and mind. As an adjective, it refers to
this and that kind of act leading to this and that kind of
purity. When we apply it to discernment, it means kusalopaya, a
skillful strategy. When we do anything at all, we have to use
our discernment to consider things from every angle before we
act, so that our actions will give complete results. This is
called having a skillful strategy for giving rise to goodness
within ourselves in full purity.
This is why the Buddha taught us to start out by using
appropriate attention in considering things over and over,
around and around many times. Only then — when things are really
clear in the mind — should we act. It's the nature of things
that the more you walk back and forth on a path, the more smooth
it gets worn. When the path gets worn really smooth, you can see
the door at the far end. If you walk back and forth many times,
the grass and weeds on the path all die. And knowledge arises:
you learn which plants growing on the side of the path can be
eaten and which ones can't. As the path gets worn more and more
smooth, you gain all sorts of benefits. One, it doesn't hurt
your feet to walk on it. Two, you learn what's growing along the
side of the path, which plants can be eaten, and what uses there
are for the plants that can't. You might be able to make them
into compost. As for the plants that can be eaten, if there's
more than enough for you to eat, you can take what's left and
sell it on the market. These are called side benefits. In
addition, when you're in a hurry, you can run easily along the
path. If you need to rest, it doesn't hurt to sit on it. If
you're sleepy, and the path is really smooth, you can lie right
down on it. If a snake or an enemy crosses your path, you can
run quickly in the other direction. So there are all sorts of
good benefits. In the same way, when we plan to make merit or do
anything skillfully, we should think things over, back and
forth, many, many times before acting, and we'll get good
results. This is the first level of thinking, called
cintamaya-pañña.
The next level goes deeper. It's called directed thought
(vitakka) and evaluation (vicara). This level isn't said to be a
part of cintamaya-pañña, but it's a similar sort of thing, only
with a difference. That's why it has to be given another name:
bhavanamaya-pañña, the discernment that comes with meditation.
When you meditate, you have to think. If you don't think, you
can't meditate, because thinking forms a necessary part of
meditation. Take jhana, for instance. Use your powers of
directed thought to bring the mind to the object, and your
powers of evaluation to be discriminating in your choice of an
object. Examine the object of your meditation until you see that
it's just right for you. You can choose slow breathing, fast
breathing, short breathing, long breathing, narrow breathing,
broad breathing, hot, cool or warm breathing; a breath that goes
only as far as the nose, a breath that goes only as far as the
base of the throat, a breath that goes all the way down to the
heart. When you've found an object that suits your taste, catch
hold of it and make the mind one, focused on a single object.
Once you've done this, evaluate your object. Direct your
thoughts to making it stand out. Don't let the mind leave the
object. Don't let the object leave the mind. Tell yourself that
it's like eating: Put the food in line with your mouth, put your
mouth in line with the food. Don't miss. If you miss, and go
sticking the food in your ear, under your chin, in your eye, or
on your forehead, you'll never get anywhere in your eating.
So it is with your meditation. Sometimes the 'one' object of
your mind takes a sudden sharp turn into the past, back hundreds
of years. Sometimes it takes off into the future, and comes back
with all sorts of things to clutter your mind. This is like
taking your food, sticking it up over your head, and letting it
fall down behind you — the dogs are sure to get it; or like
bringing the food to your mouth and then tossing it out in front
of you. When you find this happening, it's a sign that your mind
hasn't been made snug with its object. Your powers of directed
thought aren't firm enough. You have to bring the mind to the
object and then keep after it to make sure it stays put. Like
eating: Make sure the food is in line with the mouth and stick
it right in. This is directed thought: The food is in line with
the mouth, the mouth is in line with the food. You're sure it's
food, and you know what kind it is — main course or dessert,
coarse or refined.
Once you know what's what, and it's in your mouth, chew it
right up. This is evaluation: examining, reviewing your
meditation. Sometimes this comes under threshold concentration:
examining a coarse object to make it more and more refined. If
you find that the breath is long, examine long breathing. If
it's short, examine short breathing. If it's slow, examine slow
breathing — to see if the mind will stay with that kind of
breathing, to see if that kind of breathing will stay with the
mind, to see whether or not the breath is smooth and unhindered.
This is evaluation.
When the mind gives rise to directed thought and evaluation,
you have both concentration and discernment. Directed thought
and singleness of preoccupation (ekaggatarammana) fall under the
heading of concentration; evaluation, under the heading of
discernment. When you have both concentration and discernment,
the mind is still and knowledge can arise. If there's too much
evaluation, though, it can destroy your stillness of mind. If
there's too much stillness, it can snuff out thought. You have
to watch over the stillness of your mind to make sure you have
things in the right proportions. If you don't have a sense of
'just right,' you're in for trouble. If the mind is too still,
your progress will be slow. If you think too much, it'll run
away with your concentration.
So observe things carefully. Again, it's like eating. If you
go shoveling food into your mouth, you might end up choking to
death. You have to ask yourself: Is it good for me? Can I handle
it? Are my teeth strong enough? Some people have nothing but
empty gums, and yet they want to eat sugar cane: It's not
normal. Some people, even though their teeth are aching and
falling out, still want to eat crunchy foods. So it is with the
mind: As soon as it's just a little bit still, we want to see
this, know that — we want to take on more than we can handle.
You first have to make sure that your concentration is solidly
based, that your discernment and concentration are properly
balanced. This point is very important. Your powers of
evaluation have to be ripe, your directed thought firm.
Say you have a water buffalo, tie it to a stake, and pound
the stake deep into the ground. If your buffalo is strong, it
just might walk or run away with the stake, and then it's all
over the place. You have to know your buffalo's strength. If
it's really strong, pound the stake so that it's firmly in the
ground and keep watch over it. In other words, if you find that
the obsessiveness of your thinking is getting out of hand, going
beyond the bounds of mental stillness, fix the mind in place and
make it extra still — but not so still that you lose track of
things. If the mind is too quiet, it's like being in a daze. You
don't know what's going on at all. Everything is dark, blotted
out. Or else you have good and bad spells, sinking out of sight
and then popping up again. This is concentration without
directed thought or evaluation, with no sense of judgment: Wrong
Concentration.
So you have to be observant. Use your judgment — but don't
let the mind get carried away by its thoughts. Your thinking is
something separate. The mind stays with the meditation object.
Wherever your thoughts may go spinning, your mind is still
firmly based — like holding onto a post and spinning around and
around. You can keep on spinning, and yet it doesn't wear you
out. But if you let go of the post and spin around three times,
you get dizzy and — Bang! — fall flat on your face. So it is
with the mind: If it stays with the singleness of its
preoccupation, it can keep thinking and not get tired, not get
harmed. Your thinking is cintamaya-pañña; your stillness,
bhavanamaya-pañña: they're right there together. This is the
strategy of skillfulness, discernment on the level of
concentration practice. Thinking and stillness keep staying
together like this. When we practice generosity, it comes under
the level of appropriate attention; when we practice virtue, it
comes under the level of appropriate attention; and when we
practice concentration, we don't lose a beat — it comes under
the same sort of principle, only more advanced: directed thought
and evaluation. When you have directed thought and evaluation in
charge of the mind, then the more you think, the more solid and
sure the mind gets. The more you sit and meditate, the more you
think. The mind becomes more and more firm until all the
Hindrances (nivarana) fall away. The mind no longer goes looking
for concepts. Now it can give rise to knowledge.
The knowledge here isn't ordinary knowledge. It washes away
your old knowledge. You don't want the knowledge that comes from
ordinary thinking and reasoning: Let go of it. You don't want
the knowledge that comes from directed thought and evaluation:
Stop. Make the mind quiet. Still. When the mind is still and
unhindered, this is the essence of all that's meritorious and
skillful. When your mind is on this level, it isn't attached to
any concepts at all. All the concepts you've known — dealing
with the world or the Dhamma, however many or few — are washed
away. Only when they're washed away can new knowledge arise.
This is why we're taught not to hold onto concepts — all the
labels and names we have for things. You have to let yourself be
poor. It's when people are poor that they become ingenious and
resourceful. If you don't let yourself be poor, you'll never
gain discernment. In other words, you don't have to be afraid of
being stupid or of missing out on things. You don't have to be
afraid that you've hit a dead end. You don't want any of the
insights you've gained from listening to others or from reading
books, because they're concepts and therefore inconstant. You
don't want any of the insights you've gained by reasoning and
thinking, because they're concepts and therefore not-self. Let
all these insights disappear, leaving just the mind, firmly
intent, leaning neither to the left, toward self-torment or
being displeased; nor to the right, toward sensual indulgence or
being pleased. Keep the mind still, quiet, neutral, impassive —
set tall. And there you are: Right Concentration.
When Right Concentration arises in the mind, it has a shadow.
When you can catch sight of the shadow appearing, that's
vipassana: insight meditation. Vipassana-ñana is the first
branch of knowledge and skill in the Buddha's teaching. The
second branch is iddhividhi, the power of mind over matter. The
third is manomayiddhi, the power of mind-made images. The fourth
is dibba-cakkhu, clairvoyance. The fifth is dibba-sota,
clairaudience. The sixth is cetopariya-ñana, the ability to read
minds. The seventh is pubbenivasanussati-ñana, knowledge of
previous lifetimes. And the eighth, asavakkhaya-ñana, knowledge
of the ending of mental fermentations. All eight of these
branches are forms of knowledge and skill that arise from
concentration. People without concentration can't gain them:
that's an absolute guarantee. No matter how smart or clever they
may be, they can't gain these forms of knowledge. They have to
fall under the power of ignorance.
These eight branches of knowledge come from Right
Concentration. When they arise they're not called thoughts or
ideas. They're called Right Views. What looks wrong to you is
really wrong. What looks right is really right. If what looks
right is really wrong, that's Wrong View. If what looks wrong is
really right, again — Wrong View. With Right View, though, right
looks right and wrong looks wrong.
To put it in terms of cause and effect, you see the four
Noble Truths. You see stress, and it really is stressful. You
see the cause of stress arising, and that it's really causing
stress. These are Noble Truths: absolutely, undeniably,
indisputably true. You see that stress has a cause. Once the
cause arises, there has to be stress. As for the way to the
disbanding of stress, you see that the path you're following
will, without a doubt, lead to Liberation. Whether or not you go
all the way, what you see is correct. This is Right View. And as
for the disbanding of stress, you see that there really is such
a thing. You see that as long as you're on the path, stress does
in fact fall away. When you come to realize the truth of these
things in your heart, that's vipassana-ñana.
To put it even more simply: You see that all things, inside
as well as out, are undependable. The body is undependable,
aging is undependable, death is undependable. They're slippery
characters, constantly changing on you. To see this is to see
inconstancy. Don't let yourself be pleased by inconstancy. Don't
let yourself be upset. Keep the mind neutral, on an even keel.
That's what's meant by vipassana.
Sometimes inconstancy makes us happy, sometimes it makes us
sad. Say we hear that a person we don't like is going to be
demoted, or is sick or dying. It makes us gleeful, and we can't
wait for him or her to die. His body is impermanent, his life is
uncertain — it can change — but we're glad. That's a defilement.
Say we hear that a son or daughter has become wealthy,
influential, and famous, and we become happy. Again, our mind
has strayed from the noble path. It's not firmly in Right
Concentration. We have to make the mind neutral: not thrilled
over things, not upset over things, not thrilled when our plans
succeed, not upset when they don't. When we can make the mind
neutral like this, that's the neutrality of Right View. We see
what's wrong, what's right, and try to steer the mind away from
the wrong and toward the right. This is called Right Resolve,
part of vipassana-ñana.
The same holds true with stress, whether it's our stress and
pain, or somebody else's. Say we hear that an enemy is
suffering. 'Glad to hear it,' we think. 'Hope they hurry up and
die.' The heart has tilted. Say we hear that a friend has become
wealthy, and we become happy; or a son or daughter is ill, and
we become sad. Our mind has fallen in with suffering and stress.
Why? Because we don't have any knowledge. We're unskilled. The
mind isn't centered. In other words, it's not in Right
Concentration. We have to look after the mind. Don't let it fall
in with stress. Whatever suffers, let it suffer, but don't let
the mind suffer with it. The people in the world may be pained,
but the mind isn't pained along with them. Pain may arise in the
body, but the mind isn't pained along with it. Let the body go
ahead and suffer, but the mind doesn't suffer. Keep the mind
neutral. Don't be pleased by pleasure, either — pleasure is a
form of stress, you know. How so? It can change. It can rise and
fall. It can be high and low. It can't last. That's stress. Pain
is also stress: double stress. When you gain this sort of
insight into stress — when you really see stress — vipassana has
arisen in the mind.
As for anatta, not-self: Once we've examined things and seen
them for what they really are, we don't make claims, we don't
display influence, we don't try to show that we have the right
or the power to bring things that are not-self under our
control. No matter how hard we try, we can't prevent birth,
aging, illness and death. If the body is going to be old, let it
be old. If it's going to hurt, let it hurt. If it has to die,
let it die. Don't be pleased by death, either your own or that
of others. Don't be upset by death, your own or that of others.
Keep the mind neutral. Unruffled. Unfazed. This is
sankharupekkha-ñana: letting sankharas — all things fashioned
and fabricated — follow their own inherent nature. The mind like
this is in vipassana.
This is the first branch of knowledge — vipassana — in brief:
You see that all things fashioned are inconstant, stressful, and
not-self. You can disentangle them from your grasp. You can let
go. This is where it gets good. How so? You don't have to wear
yourself out, lugging sankharas around.
To be attached means to carry a load, and there are five
heaps (khandhas)we carry:
rupupadanakkhandho: physical phenomena are the first load;
vedanupadanakkhandho: feelings that we're attached to are
another;
saññupadanakkhandho: the concepts and labels that we claim
are ours are a pole for carrying a load on our shoulder;
sankharupadanakkhandho: the mental fashionings that we hang
onto and think are ours;
viññanupadanakkhandho: our attachment to sensory
consciousness.
Go ahead: Carry them around. Hang one load from your left leg
and one from your right. Put one on your left shoulder and one
on your right. Put the last load on your head. And now: Carry
them wherever you go — clumsy, encumbered, and comical.
bhara have pancakkhandha
Go ahead and carry them. The five khandhas are a heavy load,
bharaharo ca puggalo
and as individuals we burden ourselves with them.
bharadanam dukkham loke
Carry them everywhere you go, and you waste your time
suffering in the world.
The Buddha taught that whoever lacks discernment, whoever is
unskilled, whoever doesn't practice concentration leading to
liberating insight, will have to be burdened with stress, will
always be loaded down. It's pathetic. It's a shame. They'll
never get away. When they're loaded down like this, it's really
pathetic. Their legs are burdened, their shoulders burdened —
and where are they going? Three steps forward and two steps
back. Soon they'll get discouraged, and then after a while
they'll pick themselves up and get going again.
Now, when we see inconstancy — that all things fashioned,
whether within us or without, are undependable; when we see that
they're stressful; when we see that they're not our self, that
they simply whirl around in and of themselves: When we gain
these insights, we can put down our burdens, i.e., let go of our
attachments. We can put down the past — i.e., stop dwelling in
it. We can let go of the future — i.e., stop yearning for it. We
can let go of the present — i.e., stop claiming it as the self.
Once these three big baskets have fallen from our shoulders, we
can walk with a light step. We can even dance. We're beautiful.
Wherever we go, people will be glad to know us. Why? Because
we're not encumbered. Whatever we do, we can do with ease. We
can walk, run, dance and sing — all with a light heart. We're
Buddhism's beauty, a sight for sore eyes, graceful wherever we
go. No longer burdened, no longer encumbered, we can be at our
ease. This is vipassana-ñana: the first branch of knowledge.
So. Now that we've cleared away these splinters and thorns so
that everything is level and smooth, we can relax. And now we're
ready for the knowledge that we can use as a weapon. What's the
knowledge we use as a weapon? Iddhividhi. We can display powers
in one way or another, and give rise to miraculous things by way
of the body, by way of speech, or by way of the mind. We have
powers that we can use in doing the work of the religion. That's
called iddhividhi. But in the Canon they describe it as
different kinds of walking: walking through the water without
getting wet, walking through fire without getting hot, staying
out in the rain without getting chilled, staying out in the wind
without getting cold, resilient enough to withstand wind, rain,
and sun. If you're young, you can make yourself old; if old, you
can make yourself young. If you're tall, you can make yourself
short; if short, you can make yourself tall. You can change your
body in all kinds of ways.
This is why the Buddha was able to teach all kinds of people.
If he was teaching old people, he'd make his body look old. Old
people talking with old people can have a good time, because
there's no distrust or suspicion. If he met up with pretty young
women, he could make himself look young. He'd enjoy talking with
them, they'd enjoy talking with him and not get bored. This is
why the Dhamma he taught appealed to all classes of people. He
could adapt his body to fit with whatever type of society he
found himself in. For instance, if he met up with children, he'd
talk about the affairs of children, act in a childlike way. If
he met up with old people, he'd talk about the affairs of old
people. If he met up with young men and women, he'd talk about
the affairs of young men and women. They'd all enjoy listening
to what he had to say, develop a sense of faith, become
Buddhists, and even ordain. This is called iddhividhi.
Next is manomayiddhi, power in the area of the mind. The mind
acquires power. What kind of power? You can go wherever you
want. If you want to go sightseeing in hell, you can. If you
want to get away from human beings, you can go sightseeing in
hell. It's nice and relaxing. You can play with the denizens of
hell, fool around with the denizens of hell. Any of them who
have only a little bad kamma can come up and chat with you, to
send word back to their relatives. Once you get back from
touring around hell you can tell the relatives to make merit in
the dead person's name.
Or, if you want, you can travel in the world of common
animals and chat with mynah birds, owls — any kind of bird — or
with four-footed animals, two-footed animals. You can go into
the forests, into the wilds, and converse with the animals
there. It's a lot of fun, not like talking with people. Talking
with people is hard; talking with animals is easy. You don't
have to say a lot, simply think in the mind: tell them stories,
ask them questions, like, "Now that you're an animal, what do
you eat? Do you get enough to stay full and content?" You find
that you have a lot of companions there, people who used to be
your friends and relatives.
Or, if you want, you can travel in the world of the hungry
shades. The world of the hungry shades is even more fun. Hungry
shades come in all different shapes and sizes — really
entertaining, the hungry shades. Some of them have heads as big
as large water jars, but their mouths are just like the eye of a
needle: that's all, no bigger than the eye of a needle! Some of
them have legs six yards long, but hands only half a foot.
They're amazing to watch, just like a cartoon. Some of them have
lower lips with no upper lips, some of them are missing their
lips altogether, with their teeth exposed all the time. There
are all kinds of hungry shades. Some of them have big, bulging
eyes, the size of coconuts, others have fingernails as long as
palm leaves. You really ought to see them. Some of them are so
fat they can't move, others so thin that they're nothing but
bones. And sometimes the different groups get into battles,
biting each other, hitting each other. That's the hungry shades
for you. Really entertaining.
This is called manomayiddhi. When the mind is firmly
established, you can go see these things. Or you can go to the
land of the nagas, the different lands on the human level —
sometimes, when you get tired of human beings, you can go visit
the heavens: the heaven of the Four Great Kings, the heaven of
the Guardians of the Hours, the Thirty-three gods, all the way
up there to the Brahma worlds. The mind can go without any
problem. This is called manomayiddhi. It's a lot of fun. Your
defilements are gone, your work is done, you've got enough rice
to eat and money to spend, so you can go traveling to see the
sights and soak up the breezes. That's manomayiddhi.
Dibba-cakkhu: clairvoyance. You gain eyes on two levels. The
outer level is called the mansa-cakkhu, the eye of the flesh,
which enables you to look at human beings in the world, devas in
the world. The eye of discernment allows you to examine the
defilements of human beings: those with coarse defilements,
those with thick defilements, those with faith in the Buddha's
teachings, those with none, those who have the potential to be
taught, those with no potential at all. You can consider them
with your internal discernment. This is called pañña-cakkhu, the
eye of discernment. In this way you have eyes on two levels.
Most of us have eyes on only one level, the eye of the flesh,
while the inner eye doesn't arise. And how could it arise? You
don't wash the sleep out of your eyes. What are the bits of
sleep in your eyes? Sensual desire, an enormous hunk. Ill will,
another big hunk. Sloth and torpor, a hunk the size of a hammer
head. Your mind calms down and begins to grow still, but this
hunk of sleep in your eyes is so heavy it makes you nod. This is
called sloth and torpor. All you can think about is lying down
to sleep. Then there's restlessness and anxiety, another hunk of
sleep; and uncertainty, still another. When these things get
stuck in the heart, how can it possibly be bright? It's dark on
all sides. Now, when you develop your meditation and bring the
mind to stillness, that's called getting the sleep out of your
eyes. Directed thought loosens it up, and evaluation rinses it
out. Once your eyes gets rinsed and washed clean this way, they
can see clearly. The eye of your mind becomes the eye of
discernment. This is called dibba-cakkhu.
Dibba-sota: clairaudience. There are two levels of ears, as
well. The outer ears are the ones made of skin. The inner ear is
the ear of the heart. The ear of the heart doesn't appear for
the same sort of reason: its full of earwax. You never clean it
out. You don't build up any goodness in the area of the mind.
The mind isn't centered in concentration. When it's not in
concentration, and hears an attractive sound, it can't stay
still. Your ears are full of wax. You hear people gossiping or
cursing each other out, and you love to hear it. This is a
humongous hunk of wax stuck in your ear. As for the Dhamma,
you're not really interested in listening, which is why there's
nothing but earwax: earwax stuck in your mind, earwax all over
everything outside. This is why your powers of clairaudience
don't arise.
Clairaudience is really refreshing. You don't have to waste
your time listening. If you feel like listening, you can hear
anything. What the hungry shades are talking about, what common
animals are talking about, what the devas are talking about —
how fantastic it is to be in heaven — you can hear it all,
unless you don't want to listen. Like a radio: If it's turned
on, you can hear it loud and clear. If it becomes a nuisance,
you don't have to keep it on. If you have this skill, you can
turn it on to listen for the fun of it; if you don't want to
listen, you can turn it off in an instant. This is called
clairaudience, one of the skills of concentration practice.
Another skill is cetopariya-ñana, the ability to read minds,
to see if people are thinking good thoughts or bad, high, low,
crude, evil: you can use this insight to know. This is called
cetopariya-ñana, an important skill.
Then there's pubbenivasanussati-ñana, the ability to remember
previous lives, and asavakkhaya-ñana, the ability to clean out
the mind, washing away all the ignorance, craving, and clinging
inside it. You can keep ignorance from arising in the heart. You
can keep craving from taking charge of the heart. You can make
sure that there's no clinging or attachment. When you can let go
of your defilements — kama-jaho, when you're not stuck on
sensual objects or sensual desires; ditthi-jaho, when you're not
stuck on views and opinions; avijja-jaho, when you don't mistake
ignorance for knowledge and can let it go without any attachment
— when you don't latch onto evil, when you don't latch onto your
own goodness, when you can spit out evil and goodness, without
holding onto them as your own, letting them go in line with
their nature: That's called asavakkhaya-ñana, the knowledge of
the ending of the fermentations in the mind. This is the third
noble truth: the truth of cessation, achieved through the
practices that give rise to knowledge and skill.
These are the skills that arise from meditation practice.
They're
uparima-vijja, higher learning in the area of the
religion. When you've got them, you can be at your ease — at
ease if you die, at ease if you don't. You don't have to build a
rocket to go to Mars. You can live right here in the world, and
nothing will be able to harm you. In other words, you know what
things are dangerous, what things are harmful, and so you leave
them alone and don't touch them. This way you can live in safety
and peace. The heart can stay blooming and bright like this at
all times.
This is why we should be earnest and strict with ourselves in
the practice, so that we can achieve the aims we all want. Here
I've explained the eight knowledges in brief. If I were to go
into detail, there would be lots more to say. To boil it down:
All these forms of knowledge come from stillness. If the mind
isn't still, they don't arise. At best, if the mind isn't still,
you can gain knowledge only from listening, reading, or thinking
things over. But the person who can stop thinking, stop
pondering, and yet can still be intelligent: That's something
really amazing, something that goes against the currents of the
world. Normally, people in the world have to study and read,
think and ponder, if they want to be intelligent. But with the
Dhamma, you have to stop thinking, stop writing, stop
memorizing, stop doing, in order to gain the highest level of
knowledge. This is something that goes against the currents of
the world, and that human beings find hard to do.
But when you become intent in the practice that gives rise to
knowledge, you'll succeed in line with your aspirations.
Having talked on the theme of vijja-carana-sampanno, I'll end
right here.
|
Source: Translated from the Pali by Ñanamoli
Thera & Bhikkhu Bodhi. Copyright © 1991 Buddhist
Publication Society. Reproduced and reformatted from
Access to Insight edition © 1998. For free distribution.
This work may be republished, reformatted, reprinted,
and redistributed in any medium. It is the author's
wish, however, that any such republication and
redistribution be made available to the public on a free
and unrestricted basis and that translations and other
derivative works be clearly marked as such. |
|