|
by Thanissaro Bhikkhu
Karma is one of those words we don't translate. Its basic
meaning is simple enough action but because of the
weight the Buddha's teachings give to the role of action, the
Sanskrit word karma packs in so many implications that the
English word action can't carry all its luggage. This is why
we've simply airlifted the original word into our vocabulary.
But when we try unpacking the connotations the word carries now
that it has arrived in everyday usage, we find that most of its
luggage has gotten mixed up in transit. In the eyes of most
Americans, karma functions like fate bad fate, at that: an
inexplicable, unchangeable force coming out of our past, for which
we are somehow vaguely responsible and powerless to fight. "I
guess it's just my karma," I've heard people sigh when bad
fortune strikes with such force that they see no alternative to
resigned acceptance. The fatalism implicit in this statement is one
reason why so many of us are repelled by the concept of karma, for
it sounds like the kind of callous myth-making that can justify
almost any kind of suffering or injustice in the status quo:
"If he's poor, it's because of his karma." "If she's
been raped, it's because of her karma." From this it seems a
short step to saying that he or she deserves to suffer, and
so doesn't deserve our help.
This misperception comes from the fact that the Buddhist concept
of karma came to the West at the same time as non-Buddhist concepts,
and so ended up with some of their luggage. Although many Asian
concepts of karma are fatalistic, the early Buddhist concept was not
fatalistic at all. In fact, if we look closely at early Buddhist
ideas of karma, we'll find that they give even less importance to
myths about the past than most modern Americans do.
For the early Buddhists, karma was non-linear. Other Indian
schools believed that karma operated in a straight line, with
actions from the past influencing the present, and present actions
influencing the future. As a result, they saw little room for free
will. Buddhists, however, saw that karma acts in feedback loops,
with the present moment being shaped both by past and by present
actions; present actions shape not only the future but also the
present. This constant opening for present input into the causal
process makes free will possible. This freedom is symbolized in the
imagery the Buddhists used to explain the process: flowing water.
Sometimes the flow from the past is so strong that little can be
done except to stand fast, but there are also times when the flow is
gentle enough to be diverted in almost any direction.
So, instead of promoting resigned powerlessness, the early
Buddhist notion of karma focused on the liberating potential of what
the mind is doing with every moment. Who you are what you come
from is not anywhere near as important as the mind's motives for
what it is doing right now. Even though the past may account for
many of the inequalities we see in life, our measure as human beings
is not the hand we've been dealt, for that hand can change at any
moment. We take our own measure by how well we play the hand we've
got. If you're suffering, you try not to continue the unskillful
mental habits that would keep that particular karmic feedback going.
If you see that other people are suffering, and you're in a position
to help, you focus not on their karmic past but your karmic
opportunity in the present: Someday you may find yourself in the
same predicament that they're in now, so here's your opportunity to
act in the way you'd like them to act toward you when that day
comes.
This belief that one's dignity is measured, not by one's past,
but by one's present actions, flew right in the face of the Indian
traditions of caste-based hierarchies, and explains why early
Buddhists had such a field day poking fun at the pretensions and
mythology of the brahmans. As the Buddha pointed out, a brahman
could be a superior person not because he came out of a brahman
womb, but only if he acted with truly skillful intentions.
We read the early Buddhist attacks on the caste system, and aside
from their anti-racist implications, they often strike us as quaint.
What we fail to realize is that they strike right at the heart of
our myths about our own past: our obsession with defining who we are
in terms of where we come from our race, ethnic heritage,
gender, socio-economic background, sexual preference our modern
tribes. We put inordinate amounts of energy into creating and
maintaining the mythology of our tribe so that we can take vicarious
pride in our tribe's good name. Even when we become Buddhists, the
tribe comes first. We demand a Buddhism that honors our myths.
From the standpoint of karma, though, where we come from is old
karma, over which we have no control. What we "are" is a
nebulous concept at best and pernicious at worst, when we use it
to find excuses for acting on unskillful motives. The worth of a
tribe lies only in the skillful actions of its individual members.
Even when those good people belong to our tribe, their good karma is
theirs, not ours. And, of course, every tribe has its bad members,
which means that the mythology of the tribe is a fragile thing. To
hang onto anything fragile requires a large investment of passion,
aversion, and delusion, leading inevitably to more unskillful
actions on into the future.
So the Buddhist teachings on karma, far from being a quaint relic
from the past, are a direct challenge to a basic thrust and
basic flaw in our culture. Only when we abandon our obsession
with finding vicarious pride in our tribal past, and can take actual
pride in the motives that underlie our present actions, can we say
that the word karma, in its Buddhist sense, has recovered its
luggage. And when we open the luggage, we'll find that it's brought
us a gift: the gift we give ourselves and one another when we drop
our myths about who we are, and can instead be honest about what
we're doing with each moment at the same time making the effort
to do it right.
See also
Kamma - a Study Guide
Kamma and its Fruit by
Nyanaponika Thera
Prisoners of Kamma
|
Source: Copyright © 2000 Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Reproduced
and reformatted from Access to
Insight edition © 2000 For free distribution. This work may be
republished, reformatted, reprinted, and redistributed in any
medium. It is the author's wish, however, that any such
republication and redistribution be made available to the public
on a free and unrestricted basis and that translations and other
derivative works be clearly marked as such. |
|