|
None of these assertions have any support in the Canon. Although a practice called
kasina is mentioned tangentially in some of the discourses, the only point where
it is described in any detail [MN 121; MFU, pp. 82-85] makes no mention of staring
at an object or gaining a countersign. If breath meditation were congenial only
to Buddhas and their sons, there seems little reason for the Buddha to have taught
it so frequently and to such a wide variety of people. If the arising of a countersign
were essential to the attainment of jhana, one would expect it to be included in
the steps of breath meditation and in the graphic analogies used to describe jhana,
but it isn't. Some Theravadins insist that questioning the commentaries is a sign
of disrespect for the tradition, but it seems to be a sign of greater disrespect
for the Buddha — or the compilers of the Canon — to assume that he or they would
have left out something absolutely essential to the practice.
All of these points seem to indicate that what jhana means in the commentaries
is something quite different from what it means in the Canon. Because of this difference
we can say that the commentaries are right in viewing their type of jhana as unnecessary
for Awakening, but Awakening cannot occur without the attainment of jhana in the
canonical sense.
We have already given a sketch in the preceding section of how jhana in its canonical
sense can act as the basis for transcendent discernment. To recapitulate: On attaining
any of the first seven levels of jhana, one may step back slightly from the object
of jhana — entering the fifth factor of noble right concentration [§150] — to perceive
how the mind relates to the object. In doing this, one sees the process of causation
as it plays a role in bringing the mind to jhana, together with the various mental
acts of fabrication that go into keeping it there [§182]. Passage §172 lists these
acts in considerable detail. The fact that the passage emphasizes the amazing abilities
of Sariputta, the Buddha's foremost disciple in terms of discernment, implies that
there is no need for every meditator to perceive all these acts in such a detailed
fashion. What is essential is that one develop a sense of dispassion for the state
of jhana, seeing that even the relatively steady sense of refined pleasure and equanimity
it provides is artificial and willed, inconstant and stressful [§182], a state fabricated
from many different events, and thus not worth identifying with. Jhana thus becomes
an ideal test case for understanding the workings of kamma and dependent co-arising
in the mind. Its stability gives discernment a firm basis for seeing clearly; its
refined sense of pleasure and equanimity allow the mind to realize that even the
most refined mundane states involve the inconstancy and stress common to all willed
phenomena. Passage §167 lists a number of verbal mental acts surrounding the exercise
of supranormal powers that can be regarded in a similar light, as topics to be analyzed
so as to give rise to a sense of dispassion. The dispassion that results in either
case enables one to experience the fading away and cessation of the last remaining
activities in the mind, even the activity of discernment itself. When this process
fully matures, it leads on to total relinquishment, resulting in the clear knowing
and release of arahantship.
In contrast to the issue of the role of jhana as a condition for discernment,
the role of discernment as a condition for jhana is uncontroversial. Discernment
aids jhana on two levels: mundane and transcendent. On the mundane level, it enables
one to perceive the various factors that go into one's state of jhana so that one
can master them and shed the factors that prevent one from attaining a higher level
of jhana. This again involves the reflection that constitutes the fifth factor of
noble right concentration, but in
this case the results stay on the mundane level. For instance, as one masters the
first level of jhana and can reflect on the elements of stress it contains, one
may perceive that directed thought and evaluation should be abandoned because they
have become unnecessary in maintaining one's concentration, just as the forms used
in pouring a cement wall become unnecessary when the cement has hardened. In dropping
these factors, one then goes on to the second level of jhana. Passage
§175 gives a list of the factors that, in succession,
are dropped in this way as one attains higher and higher levels of concentration.
On the transcendent level, the discernment that precipitates Awakening results
in a supramundane level of jhana called the fruit of gnosis, which is described
in §§176-77 — a type of jhana independent of all perceptions (mental labels) and
intentional processes, beyond all limitations of cosmos, time, and the present:
the arahant's foretaste, in this lifetime, of the absolutely total Unbinding experienced
by the awakened mind at death.
Passages from the Pali
Canon

§ 165.
These four types of individuals are to be found existing in world. Which four?
There is the case of the individual who has attained internal tranquillity of
awareness, but not insight into phenomena through heightened discernment. There
is... the individual who has attained insight into phenomena through heightened
discernment, but not internal tranquillity of awareness. There is... the individual
who has attained neither internal tranquillity of awareness nor insight into phenomena
through heightened discernment. And there is... the individual who has attained
both internal tranquillity of awareness & insight into phenomena through heightened
discernment.
The individual who has attained internal tranquillity of awareness, but not insight
into phenomena through heightened discernment, should approach an individual who
has attained insight into phenomena through heightened discernment... and ask him:
'How should fabrications be regarded? How should they be investigated? How should
they be seen with insight?' The other will answer in line with what he has seen
& experienced: 'Fabrications should be regarded in this way... investigated in this
way... seen in this way with insight.' Then eventually he [the first] will become
one who has attained both internal tranquillity of awareness & insight into phenomena
through heightened discernment.
As for the individual who has attained insight into phenomena through heightened
discernment, but not internal tranquillity of awareness, he should approach an individual
who has attained internal tranquillity of awareness... and ask him, 'How should
the mind be steadied? How should it be made to settle down? How should it be unified?
How should it be concentrated?' The other will answer in line with what he has seen
& experienced: 'The mind should be steadied in this way... made to settle down in
this way... unified in this way... concentrated in this way.' Then eventually he
[the first] will become one who has attained both internal tranquillity of awareness
& insight into phenomena through heightened discernment.
As for the individual who has attained neither internal tranquillity of awareness
nor insight into phenomena through heightened discernment, he should approach an
individual who has attained both internal tranquillity of awareness & insight into
phenomena through heightened discernment... and ask him, 'How should the mind be
steadied? How should it be made to settle down? How should it be unified? How should
it be concentrated? How should fabrications be regarded? How should they be investigated?
How should they be seen with insight?' The other will answer in line with what he
has seen & experienced: 'The mind should be steadied in this way... made to settle
down in this way... unified in this way... concentrated in this way. Fabrications
should be regarded in this way... investigated in this way... seen in this way with
insight.' Then eventually he [the first] will become one who has attained both internal
tranquillity of awareness & insight into phenomena through heightened discernment.
As for the individual who has attained both internal tranquillity of awareness
& insight into phenomena through heightened discernment, his duty is to make an
effort in establishing ('tuning') those very same skillful qualities to a higher
degree for the ending of the effluents. — AN IV.94
§ 166. Ven. Ananda: Whenever
a monk or nun declares the attainment of arahantship in my presence, they all do
it by means of one or another of four paths. Which four?
There is the case where a monk has developed insight preceded by tranquillity.
As he develops insight preceded by tranquillity, the path is born. He follows that
path, develops it, pursues it. As he follows the path, developing it & pursuing
it — his fetters are abandoned, his obsessions destroyed.
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk has developed tranquillity preceded
by insight. As he develops tranquillity preceded by insight, the path is born. He
follows that path... His fetters are abandoned, his obsessions destroyed.
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk has developed tranquillity & insight
in concert. As he develops tranquillity & insight in concert, the path is born.
He follows that path... His fetters are abandoned, his obsessions destroyed.
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk's mind has its restlessness concerning
the Dhamma [Comm: the corruptions of insight] well under control. There comes a
time when his mind grows steady inwardly, settles down, and becomes unified & concentrated.
In him the path is born. He follows that path... His fetters are abandoned, his
obsessions destroyed.
Whenever a monk or nun declares the attainment of arahantship in my presence,
they all do it by means of one or another of these four paths. — AN IV.170
§ 167. Then Ven. Anuruddha
went to where Ven. Sariputta was staying
and, on arrival, greeted him courteously. After an exchange of friendly greetings
& courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there, he said to Ven. Sariputta:
By means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human, I see the thousand-fold
cosmos. My persistence is aroused & unsluggish. My mindfulness is established &
unshaken. My body is calm & unaroused. My mind is concentrated into singleness.
And yet my mind is not released from the effluents through lack of clinging/sustenance.
Sariputta: My friend, when the thought occurs to you, 'By means of the divine
eye, purified & surpassing the human, I see the thousand-fold cosmos,' that is related
to your conceit. When the thought occurs to you, 'My persistence is aroused & unsluggish.
My mindfulness is established & unshaken. My body is calm & unperturbed. My mind
is concentrated into singleness,' that is related to your restlessness. When the
thought occurs to you, 'And yet my mind is not released from the effluents through
lack of clinging/sustenance,' that is related to your anxiety. It would be well
if — abandoning these three qualities, not attending to these three qualities —
you directed your mind to the Deathless property.'
So after that, Ven. Anuruddha — abandoning
those three qualities, not attending to those three qualities — directed his mind
to the Deathless property. Dwelling alone, secluded, heedful, ardent, & resolute,
he in no long time reached & remained in the supreme goal of the holy life for which
clansmen rightly go forth from home into homelessness, knowing & realizing it for
himself in the here & now. He knew: 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the
task done. There is nothing further for the sake of this world.' And thus Ven. Anuruddha
became another one of the arahants. — AN III.128
§ 168. And what is an individual
released in both ways? There is the case of the individual who remains touching
with his body the peaceful liberations, the formlessnesses beyond forms; when he
has seen with discernment, his effluents are totally ended. I do not say that such
a monk has any duty to do with heedfulness. Why is that? Because he has done his
duty with heedfulness; he is no more capable of being heedless.
And what is an individual released through discernment? There is the case of
the individual who does not remain touching with his body the peaceful liberations,
the formlessnesses beyond forms; but when he has seen with discernment, his effluents
are totally ended. I do not say that such a monk has any duty to do with heedfulness.
Why is that? Because he has done his duty with heedfulness; he is no more capable
of being heedless. — MN 70
§ 169. Develop concentration,
monks. A concentrated monk discerns things as they actually are present. And what
does he discern as it actually is present?
'This is stress,' he discerns as it actually is present. 'This is the origination
of stress... This is the cessation of stress... This is the path of practice leading
to the cessation of stress,' he discerns as it actually is present...
Therefore your duty is the contemplation, 'This is stress... This is the origination
of stress... This is the cessation of stress... This is the path of practice leading
to the cessation of stress.' — SN LVI.1
§ 170. Develop concentration,
monks. A concentrated monk discerns things as they actually are present. And what
does he discern as it actually is present?
The origination & disappearance of form... of feeling... of perception... of
fabrications... of consciousness.
And what is the origination of form... of feeling... of perception... of fabrications...
of consciousness? There is the case where one relishes, welcomes, & remains fastened.
To what? One relishes form, welcomes it, & remains fastened to it. While one is
relishing form, welcoming it, & remaining fastened to it, delight arises. Any delight
in form is clinging. With that clinging as a condition there is becoming. With becoming
as a condition there is birth. With birth as a condition then aging & death, sorrow,
lamentation, pain, distress, & despair all come into play. Thus is the origination
of this entire mass of suffering & stress. (Similarly with feeling, perception,
fabrications, & consciousness.)
And what is the disappearance of form... feeling... perception... fabrications...
consciousness? There is the case where one does not relish, welcome or remain fastened.
To what? One does not relish form, welcome it, or remain fastened to it. While one
is not relishing form, welcoming it, or remaining fastened to it, one's delight
in form ceases. From the cessation of that delight, clinging ceases. From the cessation
of clinging, becoming ceases. From the cessation of becoming, birth ceases. From
the cessation of birth, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress,
& despair all cease. Thus is the cessation of this entire mass of suffering & stress
[§211]. (Similarly with feeling, perception, fabrications,
& consciousness.) — SN XXII.5
§ 171.
There's no jhana
for one with no discernment,
no discernment
for one with no jhana.
But one with both jhana
& discernment:
he's on the verge
of Unbinding.
— DHP.372
§ 172. Monks,
Sariputta is wise, of great discernment,
deep discernment, wide... joyous... rapid... quick... penetrating discernment...
There is the case where Sariputta... enters & remains in the first jhana. Whatever
qualities there are in the first jhana — applied thought, evaluation, rapture, pleasure,
singleness of mind, contact, feeling, perception, intention, consciousness (vl.
intent), desire, decision, persistence, mindfulness, equanimity, & attention — he
ferrets them out one by one. Known to him they arise, known to him they remain,
known to him they subside. He discerns, 'So this is how these qualities, not having
been, come into play. Having been, they vanish.' He remains unattracted & unrepelled
with regard to those qualities, independent, detached, released, dissociated, with
an awareness rid of barriers. He understands, 'There is a further escape,' and pursuing
it, he confirms that 'There is.' (Similarly with the levels of jhana up through
the dimension of nothingness.)
Furthermore, completely transcending the dimension of nothingness, he enters
& remains in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception. He emerges
mindful from that attainment. On emerging... he regards the past qualities that
have ceased & changed: 'So this is how these qualities, not having been, come into
play. Having been, they vanish.' He remains unattracted & unrepelled with regard
to those qualities, independent, detached, released, dissociated, with an awareness
rid of barriers. He understands, 'There is a further escape,' and pursuing it, he
confirms that 'There is.'
Furthermore, completely transcending the dimension of neither perception nor
non-perception, he enters & remains in the cessation of feeling & perception. When
he sees with discernment, his effluents are totally ended. He emerges mindful from
that attainment. On emerging... he regards the past qualities that have ceased &
changed: 'So this is how these qualities, not having been, come into play. Having
been, they vanish.' He remains unattracted & unrepelled with regard to those qualities,
independent, detached, released, dissociated, with an awareness rid of barriers.
He understands, 'There is no further escape,' and pursuing it, he confirms that
'There isn't.'
If someone, rightly describing a person, were to say, 'He has attained mastery
& perfection in noble virtue... noble concentration... noble discernment... noble
release,' he would be rightly describing Sariputta... Sariputta takes the unexcelled
wheel of Dhamma set rolling by the Tathagata, and keeps it rolling rightly. — MN
111
§ 173. I tell you, the ending
of the effluents depends on the first jhana... the second jhana... the third...
the fourth... the dimension of the infinitude of space... the dimension of the infinitude
of consciousness... the dimension of nothingness... the dimension of neither perception
nor non-perception.
'I tell you, the ending of the effluents depends on the first jhana.' Thus it
has been said. In reference to what was it said?... Suppose that an
archer or archer's apprentice were to practice
on a straw man or mound of clay, so that after a while he would become able to shoot
long distances, to fire accurate shots in rapid succession, and to pierce great
masses. In the same way, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the
first jhana: rapture & pleasure born of withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought
& evaluation. He regards whatever phenomena there that are connected with form,
feeling, perception, fabrications, & consciousness, as inconstant, stressful, a
disease, a cancer, an arrow, painful, an affliction, alien, a disintegration, an
emptiness, not-self. He turns his mind
away from those phenomena, and having done so, inclines his mind to the property
of deathlessness: 'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications;
the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation;
Unbinding.'
Staying right there, he reaches the ending of the mental effluents. Or, if not,
then — through this very dhamma-passion, this very dhamma-delight, and from the
total wasting away of the first five of the Fetters [self-identity views, grasping
at precepts & practices, uncertainty, sensual passion, and resistance] — he is due
to be reborn [in the Pure Abodes], there to be totally unbound, never again to return
from that world.
'I tell you, the ending of the effluents depends on the first jhana.' Thus was
it said, and in reference to this was it said.
(Similarly with the other levels of jhana up through the dimension of nothingness.)
Thus, as far as the perception-attainments go, that is as far as gnosis-penetration
goes. As for these two spheres — the attainment of the dimension of neither perception
nor non-perception & the attainment of the cessation of feeling & perception — I
tell you that they are to be rightly explained by those monks who are meditators,
skilled in attaining, skilled in attaining & emerging, who have attained & emerged
in dependence on them. — AN IX.36
§ 174. Then
Dasama the householder from the city of Atthaka
went to where Ven. Ananda was staying and on arrival, having bowed down, sat to
one side. As he was sitting there, he said to Ven. Ananda, 'Is there, venerable
sir, any one condition explained by the Blessed One... whereby a monk — dwelling
heedful, ardent, & resolute — releases his mind that is as yet unreleased, or whereby
the effluents not yet brought to an end come to an end, or whereby he attains the
unsurpassed security from bondage that he has not yet attained?
Ananda: Yes, householder, there is... There is the case where a monk... enters
& remains in the first jhana... He notices that 'This first jhana is fabricated
& willed.' He discerns, 'Whatever is fabricated & willed is inconstant & subject
to cessation.' Staying right there, he reaches the ending of the effluents. Or,
if not, then — through passion & delight for this very phenomenon [of discernment]
and from the total ending of the first five Fetters — he is due to be reborn [in
the Pure Abodes], there to be totally unbound, never again to return from that world.
(Similarly with the other levels of jhana up through the dimension of nothingness
and the four releases of awareness based on good will, compassion, appreciation,
& equanimity.) — AN XI.17
§ 175.
Sariputta: This Unbinding is pleasant,
friends. This Unbinding is pleasant.
Udayin: But what is the pleasure here,
my friend, where there is nothing felt?
Sariputta: Just that is the pleasure here, my friend: where there is nothing
felt. There are these five strings of sensuality. Which five? Forms cognizable via
the eye — agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing;
sounds... smells... tastes... tactile sensations cognizable via the body — agreeable,
pleasing, charming, endearing, fostering desire, enticing. Whatever pleasure or
joy arises in dependence on these five strings of sensuality, that is sensual pleasure.
Now there is the case where a monk — quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn
from unskillful qualities — enters & remains in the first jhana... If, as he remains
there, he is beset with attention to perceptions dealing with sensuality,
that is an affliction for him. Just as pain arises
as an affliction for a healthy person, even so the attention to perceptions dealing
with sensuality that beset the monk is an affliction for him. Now the Blessed One
has said that whatever is an affliction is stress. So by this line of reasoning
it may be known how Unbinding is pleasant.
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the second
jhana... If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention to perceptions dealing
with directed thought, that is an affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the third
jhana... If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention to perceptions dealing
with rapture, that is an affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the fourth
jhana... If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention to perceptions dealing
with equanimity, that is an affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the dimension
of the infinitude of space. If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention
to perceptions dealing with form, that is an affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the dimension
of the infinitude of consciousness. If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention
to perceptions dealing with the dimension of the infinitude of space, that
is an affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the dimension
of nothingness. If, as he remains there, he is beset with attention to perceptions
dealing with the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, that is an
affliction for him...
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the dimension
of neither perception nor non-perception. If, as he remains there, he is beset with
attention to perceptions dealing with the dimension of nothingness, that
is an affliction for him... whatever is an affliction is stress. So by this line
of reasoning it may be known how Unbinding is pleasant.
Furthermore, there is the case where a monk... enters & remains in the cessation
of perception & feeling. And, having seen [that] with discernment, his effluents
are completely ended. So by this line of reasoning it may be known how Unbinding
is pleasant. — AN IX.34
§ 176. Ananda: It is amazing,
my friend, it is marvelous, how the Blessed One has attained & recognized the opportunity
for the purification of beings... and the direct realization of Unbinding, where
the eye will be, and forms, and yet one will not be sensitive to that sphere; where
the ear will be, and sounds... where the nose will be, and smells... where the tongue
will be, and tastes... where the body will be, and tactile sensations, and yet one
will not be sensitive to that sphere.
Udayin: Is one insensitive to that dimension
with or without a perception in mind?
Ananda: ...with a perception in mind...
Udayin: ...what perception?
Ananda: There is the case where with the complete transcending of perceptions
dealing with form, with the disappearance of perceptions of resistance, and not
heeding perceptions of diversity, thinking, 'infinite space,' one remains in the
dimension of the infinitude of space: Having this perception in mind, one is not
sensitive to that sphere.
Further, with the complete transcending of the dimension of the infinitude of
space, thinking, 'infinite consciousness,' one remains in the dimension of the infinitude
of consciousness: Having this perception in mind, one is not sensitive to that sphere.
Further, with the complete transcending of the dimension of the infinitude of
consciousness, thinking, 'There is nothing,' one remains in the dimension of nothingness:
Having this perception in mind, one is not sensitive to that sphere.
Once, friend, when I was staying in Saketa at the Game Refuge in the Black Forest,
the nun Jatila Bhagika went to where I was
staying, and on arrival — having bowed to me — stood to one side. As soon as she
had stood to one side, she said to me: 'The concentration whereby — neither pressed
down nor forced back, nor with mental fabrications kept blocked or suppressed —
still as a result of release, contented as a result of stillness, and as a result
of contentment one is not agitated: This concentration is said by the Blessed One
to be the fruit of what?'
I said to her, '...This concentration is said by the Blessed One to be the fruit
of gnosis [the knowledge of Awakening].' Having this sort of perception, friend,
one is not sensitive to that sphere. — AN IX.37
§ 177. The Buddha:
Sandha, practice the absorption (jhana) of
a thoroughbred horse, not the absorption of
an unbroken colt. And how is an unbroken colt
absorbed?
An unbroken colt, tied to the feeding trough, is absorbed with the thought, 'Barley
grain! Barley grain!' Why is that? Because as he is tied to the feeding trough,
the thought does not occur to him, 'I wonder what task the trainer will have me
do today? What should I do in response?' Tied to the feeding trough, he is simply
absorbed with the thought, 'Barley grain! Barley grain!'
In the same way, there are cases where an unbroken colt of a man, having gone
to the wilderness, to the foot of a tree, or to an empty dwelling, dwells with his
awareness overcome by sensual passion, obsessed with sensual passion. He does not
discern the escape, as it actually is present, from sensual passion once it has
arisen. Making that sensual passion the focal point, he absorbs himself with it,
besorbs, resorbs, & supersorbs himself with it.
He dwells with his awareness overcome by ill will... sloth & drowsiness... restlessness
& anxiety... uncertainty, obsessed with uncertainty. He does not discern the escape,
as it actually is present, from uncertainty once it has arisen. Making that uncertainty
the focal point, he absorbs himself with it, besorbs, resorbs, & supersorbs himself
with it.
He is absorbed dependent on earth... liquid... fire... wind... the dimension
of the infinitude of space... the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness...
the dimension of nothingness... the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception...
this world... the next world... whatever is seen, heard, sensed, cognized, attained,
sought after, pondered by the intellect. That is how an unbroken colt of a man is
absorbed.
And how is a thoroughbred absorbed? An excellent thoroughbred horse tied to the
feeding trough, is not absorbed with the thought, 'Barley grain! Barley grain!'
Why is that? Because as he is tied to the feeding trough, the thought occurs to
him, 'I wonder what task the trainer will have me do today? What should I do in
response?' Tied to the feeding trough, he is not absorbed with the thought, 'Barley
grain! Barley grain!' The excellent thoroughbred horse regards the feel of the spur
as a debt, an imprisonment, a loss, a piece of bad luck.
In the same way, an excellent thoroughbred of a man, having gone to the wilderness,
to the foot of a tree, or to an empty dwelling, dwells with his awareness not overcome
by sensual passion, not obsessed with sensual passion. He discerns the escape, as
it actually is present, from sensual passion once it has arisen.
He dwells with his awareness not overcome by ill will... sloth & drowsiness...
restlessness & anxiety... uncertainty, obsessed with uncertainty. He discerns the
escape, as it actually is present, from uncertainty once it has arisen.
He is absorbed dependent neither on earth, liquid, heat, wind, the dimension
of the infinitude of space, the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, the
dimension of nothingness, the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception,
this world, the next world, nor on whatever is seen, heard, sensed, cognized, attained,
sought after, or pondered by the intellect — and yet he is absorbed. And to this
excellent thoroughbred of a man, absorbed in this way, the gods, together with
Indra, the
Brahmas, &
Pajapati, pay homage even from afar:
'Homage to you, O thoroughbred man.
Homage to you, O superlative man —
you of whom we don't know even what
dependent on which
you're absorbed.'
Sandha: But in what way is the excellent thoroughbred of a man absorbed when
he is absorbed...?
The Buddha: There is the case, Sandha, where for an excellent thoroughbred of
a man the perception (mental note or label) of earth with regard to earth has ceased
to exist; the perception of liquid with regard to liquid... the perception of fire
with regard to fire... the perception of wind with regard to wind... the perception
of the dimension of the infinitude of space with regard to the dimension of the
infinitude of space... the perception of the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness
with regard to the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness... the perception
of the dimension of nothingness with regard to the dimension of nothingness... the
perception of the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception with regard
to the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception... the perception of this
world with regard to this world... the next world with regard to the next world...
and whatever is seen, heard, sensed, cognized, attained, sought after, or pondered
by the intellect: the perception of that has ceased to exist.
Absorbed in this way, the excellent thoroughbred of a man is absorbed dependent
neither on earth, liquid, fire, wind, the dimension of the infinitude of space,
the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, the dimension of nothingness,
the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, this world, the next world,
nor on whatever is seen, heard, sensed, cognized, attained, sought after, or pondered
by the intellect — and yet he is absorbed. And to this excellent thoroughbred of
a man, absorbed in this way, the gods, together with Indra, the Brahmas, & Pajapati,
pay homage even from afar:
'Homage to you, O thoroughbred man.
Homage to you, O superlative man —
you of whom we don't know even what
dependent on which
you're absorbed.' — AN XI.10
§ 178. Knowledge of the ending
of the effluents, as it is actually present, occurs to one who is concentrated,
I tell you, and not to one who is not concentrated. So concentration is the path,
monks. Non-concentration is no path at all. — AN VI.64
We have pinpointed the fifth, reflective level of
noble right concentration [§150]
as the mental state in which transcendent discernment can arise. A look at how equanimity
functions in this process will help to flesh out our account of this state.
The word "equanimity" is used in the Canon in two basic senses: 1) a neutral
feeling in the absense of pleasure and pain, and 2) an attitude of even-mindedness
in the face of every sort of experience, regardless of whether pleasure and pain
are present or not. The attitude of even-mindedness is what is meant here.
Passage §179 gives an outline of the place of equanimity
in the emotional life of a person on the path of practice. This outline is interesting
for several reasons. To begin with, contrary to many teachings currently popular
in the West, it shows that there is a skillful use for the sense of distress that
can come to a person who longs for the goal of the practice but has yet to attain
it. This sense of distress can help one to get over the distress that comes when
one feels deprived of pleasant sensory objects, for one realizes that the goal unattained
is a much more serious lack than an unattained sensual pleasure. With one's priorities
thus straightened out, one will turn one's energy to the pursuit of the path, rather
than to sensual objectives. As the path thus matures, it results in the sense of
joy that comes on gaining an insight into the true nature of sensory objects — a
joy that in turn matures into a sense of equanimity resulting from that very same
insight. This is the highest stage of what is called equanimity "dependent on multiplicity"
— i.e., equanimity in the face of multiple objects.
Passages §180 and §181
go into more detail on how to foster this sort of equanimity. Passage
§181 describes three stages in the process: 1) development,
or a conscious turning of the mind to equanimity in the face of agreeable or disagreeable
objects; 2) a state of being in training, in which one feels a spontaneous
disillusionment with agreeable or disagreeable objects; and 3) fully developed
faculties, in which one's even-mindedness is so completely mastered that one
is in full control of one's thought processes in the face of agreeable or disagreeable
objects. Because the first of these three stages is a conscious process, both
§180 and §181 illustrate it
with a series of graphic metaphors to help "tune" the mind to the right attitude
and to help keep that attitude firmly in mind.
However, the cultivation of equanimity does not stop with equanimity dependent
on multiplicity. Formless jhana, if one is able to attain it, functions as a basis
for equanimity dependent on singleness
[§179], i.e., the singleness of jhana. The next stage
is to use this equanimity to bring on the state of equipoise called
non-fashioning (atammayata), although
§183 shows that non-fashioning can be attained directly
from any of the stages of jhana, and not just the formless ones. Exactly what non-fashioning
involves is shown in §182: one perceives the fabricated
and willed nature of even one's refined state of jhana, and becomes so dispassionate
toward the whole process that one "neither fabricates nor wills for the sake of
becoming or un-becoming." In this state of non-fashioning, the mind is so balanced
that it contributes absolutely no present input into the conditioning of experience
at all. Because the process of conditioned or fabricated experience, on the unawakened
level, requires present input together with input from the past in order to continue
functioning, the entire process then breaks down, and all that remains is the
Unfabricated.
After this experience, the processes of worldly experience resume due to the
kammic input from the past, but one's attitude toward these processes is changed,
in line with the mental fetters [II/A] that have been cut by the Awakening. If the
Awakening was total, one continues to deal on an awakened level with the world until
the time of one's total Unbinding with an attitude of perfect even-mindedness, illustrated
by the three "frames of reference" described at the end of
§179 [see also II/B]. One feels sympathy for others and
seeks their well-being, experiencing a sense of satisfaction when they respond to
one's teachings, but otherwise one stays equanimous, untroubled, mindful, and alert.
This passage shows that the even-mindedness of a fully awakened person is not an
attitude of cold indifference, but rather of mental imperturbability. Such a person
has found true happiness and would like others to share that happiness as well,
but that happiness is not dependent on how others respond. This is the ideal state
of mind for a person who truly works for the benefit of the world.
Passages from the Pali
Canon

§ 179. 'The thirty-six emotions
should be known by experience.' Thus was it said. And in reference to what was it
said? Six kinds of household joy & six kinds of renunciation joy; six kinds of household
distress & six kinds of renunciation distress; six kinds of household equanimity
& six kinds of renunciation equanimity.
And what are the six kinds of household joy? The joy that arises when one regards
as an acquisition the acquisition of forms cognizable by the eye — agreeable, pleasing,
charming, endearing, connected with worldly baits — or when one recalls the previous
acquisition of such forms after they have passed, ceased & changed: That is called
household joy. (Similarly with sounds, smells, tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
And what are the six kinds of renunciation joy? The joy that arises when — experiencing
the inconstancy of those very forms, their change, fading, & cessation — one sees
with right discernment as it actually is that all forms, past or present, are inconstant,
stressful, subject to change: That is called renunciation joy. (Similarly with sounds,
smells, tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
And what are the six kinds of household distress? The distress that arises when
one regards as a non-acquisition the non-acquisition of forms cognizable by the
eye — agreeable, pleasing, charming, endearing, connected with worldly baits — or
when one recalls the previous non-acquisition of such forms after they have passed,
ceased & changed: That is called household distress. (Similarly with sounds, smells,
tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
And what are the six kinds of renunciation distress? The distress coming from
the longing that arises in one who is filled with longing for the unexcelled liberations
when — experiencing the inconstancy of those very forms, their change, fading, &
cessation — he sees with right discernment as it actually is that all forms, past
or present, are inconstant, stressful, subject to change and he is filled with this
longing: 'O when will I enter & remain in the dimension that the noble ones now
enter & remain in?' This is called renunciation distress. (Similarly with sounds,
smells, tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
And what are the six kinds of household equanimity? The equanimity that arises
when a foolish, deluded person — a run-of-the-mill, untaught person who has not
conquered his limitation or the results of action & who is blind to danger — sees
a form with the eye. Such equanimity does not go beyond the form, which is why it
is called household equanimity. (Similarly with sounds, smells, tastes, tactile
sensations, & ideas.)
And what are the six kinds of renunciation equanimity? The equanimity that arises
when — experiencing the inconstancy of those very forms, their change, fading, &
cessation — one sees with right discernment as it actually is that all forms, past
or present, are inconstant, stressful, subject to change: This equanimity goes beyond
form, which is why it is called renunciation equanimity. (Similarly with sounds,
smells, tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
'Thirty-six emotions should be known by experience.' Thus was it said. And in
reference to this was it said.
'With regard to them, depending on this, abandon that.' Thus was it said. And
in reference to what was it said?
Here, by depending & relying on the six kinds of renunciation joy, abandon &
transcend the six kinds of household joy. Such is their abandoning, such is their
transcending. By depending & relying on the six kinds of renunciation distress,
abandon & transcend the six kinds of household distress. Such is their abandoning,
such is their transcending. By depending & relying on the six kinds of renunciation
equanimity, abandon & transcend the six kinds of household equanimity. Such is their
abandoning, such their transcending.
By depending & relying on the six kinds of renunciation joy, abandon & transcend
the six kinds of renunciation distress. Such is their abandoning, such is their
transcending. By depending & relying on the six kinds of renunciation equanimity,
abandon & transcend the six kinds of renunciation joy. Such is their abandoning,
such their transcending.
There is equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity; and
there is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on singleness.
And what is equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity? There
is equanimity with regard to forms, equanimity with regard to sounds... smells...
tastes... tactile sensations [& ideas: this word appears in one of the recensions].
This is equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity.
And what is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on singleness? There
is equanimity dependent on the dimension of the infinitude of space, equanimity
dependent on the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness... dependent on the
dimension of nothingness... dependent on the dimension of neither perception nor
non-perception. This is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on singleness.
By depending & relying on equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on singleness,
abandon & transcend equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity.
Such is its abandoning, such its transcending.
By depending & relying on non-fashioning,
abandon & transcend the equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on singleness.
Such is its abandoning, such its transcending.
'Depending on this, abandon that.' Thus was it said. And in reference to this
was it said.
'There are three frames of reference that a noble one cultivates, cultivating
which he is a teacher fit to instruct a group.' Thus was it said. And in reference
to what was it said?
There is the case where the Teacher — out of sympathy, seeking their well-being
— teaches the Dhamma to his disciples: 'This is for your well-being, this is for
your happiness.' His disciples do not listen or lend ear or apply their minds to
gnosis. Turning aside, they stray from the Teacher's message. In this case the Tathagata
is not satisfied nor is he sensitive to satisfaction, yet he remains untroubled,
mindful, & alert. This is the first frame of reference...
Furthermore, there is the case where the Teacher — out of sympathy, seeking their
well-being — teaches the Dhamma to his disciples: 'This is for your well-being,
this is for your happiness.' Some of his disciples do not listen or lend ear or
apply their minds to gnosis. Turning aside, they stray from the Teacher's message.
But some of his disciples listen, lend ear, & apply their minds to gnosis. They
do not turn aside or stray from the Teacher's message. In this case the Tathagata
is not satisfied nor is he sensitive to satisfaction; at the same time he is not
dissatisfied nor is he sensitive to dissatisfaction. Free from both satisfaction
& dissatisfaction, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert. This is the second frame
of reference...
Furthermore, there is the case where the Teacher — out of sympathy, seeking their
well-being — teaches the Dhamma to his disciples: 'This is for your well-being,
this is for your happiness.' His disciples listen, lend ear, & apply their minds
to gnosis. They do not turn aside or stray from the Teacher's message. In this case
the Tathagata is satisfied and is sensitive to satisfaction, yet he remains untroubled,
mindful, & alert. This is the third frame of reference...
'There are three frames of reference that a noble one cultivates, cultivating
which he is a teacher fit to instruct a group.' Thus was it said. And in reference
to this was it said. — MN 137
§ 180.
Rahula, develop meditation in tune with
earth. For when you are developing meditation
in tune with earth, agreeable & disagreeable sensory impressions that have arisen
will not stay in charge of your mind. Just as when people throw what is clean or
unclean on the earth — feces, urine, saliva, pus, or blood — the earth is not horrified,
humiliated, or disgusted by it; in the same way, when you are developing meditation
in tune with earth, agreeable & disagreeable sensory impressions that have arisen
will not stay in charge of your mind.
Develop meditation in tune with water. For
when you are developing meditation in tune with water, agreeable & disagreeable
sensory impressions that have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind. Just
as when people wash what is clean or unclean in water — feces, urine, saliva, pus,
or blood — the water is not horrified, humiliated, or disgusted by it; in the same
way, when you are developing meditation in tune with water, agreeable & disagreeable
sensory impressions that have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind.
Develop meditation in tune with fire. For
when you are developing meditation in tune with fire, agreeable & disagreeable sensory
impressions that have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind. Just as when
fire burns what is clean or unclean — feces, urine, saliva, pus, or blood — it is
not horrified, humiliated, or disgusted by it; in the same way, when you are developing
meditation in tune with fire, agreeable & disagreeable sensory impressions that
have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind.
Develop meditation in tune with wind. For
when you are developing meditation in tune with wind, agreeable & disagreeable sensory
impressions that have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind. Just as when
wind blows what is clean or unclean — feces, urine, saliva, pus, or blood — it is
not horrified, humiliated, or disgusted by it; in the same way, when you are developing
meditation in tune with wind, agreeable & disagreeable sensory impressions that
have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind.
Develop meditation in tune with space. For
when you are developing meditation in tune with space, agreeable & disagreeable
sensory impressions that have arisen will not stay in charge of your mind. Just
as space is not established anywhere, in the same way, when you are developing meditation
in tune with space, agreeable & disagreeable sensory impressions that have arisen
will not stay in charge of your mind. — MN 62
§ 181. And how, Ananda, in
the discipline of a noble one is there the unexcelled development of the faculties?
There is the case where, when seeing a form with the eye, there arises in a monk
what is agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He discerns
that 'This agreeable thing has arisen in me, this disagreeable thing... this agreeable
& disagreeable thing has arisen in me. And that is compounded, gross, dependently
co-arisen. But this is peaceful, this is exquisite, i.e., equanimity.' With that,
the arisen agreeable thing... disagreeable thing... agreeable & disagreeable thing
ceases, and equanimity takes its stance. Just as a
man with good eyes, having closed
them, might open them; or having opened them, might close them, that is how quickly,
how rapidly, how easily, no matter what it refers to, the arisen agreeable thing...
disagreeable thing... agreeable & disagreeable thing ceases, and equanimity takes
its stance. In the discipline of a noble one, this is called the unexcelled development
of the faculties with regard to forms cognizable by the eye.
Furthermore, when hearing a sound with the ear, there arises in a monk what is
agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He discerns that...
and equanimity takes its stance. Just as a
strong man might easily
snap his fingers, that is how quickly... equanimity
takes its stance. In the discipline of the noble ones, this is called the unexcelled
development of the faculties with regard to sounds cognizable by the ear.
Furthermore, when smelling an aroma with the nose, there arises in a monk what
is agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He discerns
that... and equanimity takes its stance. Just as
drops of water roll off a gently
sloping lotus leaf & do not remain there, that is how quickly... equanimity takes
its stance. In the discipline of the noble ones, this is called the unexcelled development
of the faculties with regard to aromas cognizable by the nose.
Furthermore, when tasting a flavor with the tongue, there arises in a monk what
is agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He discerns
that... and equanimity takes its stance. Just as a strong man might easily spit
out a ball of saliva gathered on the tip of his
tongue, that is how quickly... equanimity takes its stance. In the discipline of
the noble ones, this is called the unexcelled development of the faculties with
regard to flavors cognizable by the tongue.
Furthermore, when touching a tactile sensation with the body, there arises in
a monk what is agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable.
He discerns that... and equanimity takes its stance. Just as a strong man might
easily extend his flexed arm or flex his extended arm, that is how quickly... equanimity
takes its stance. In the discipline of the noble ones, this is called the unexcelled
development of the faculties with regard to tactile sensations cognizable by the
body.
Furthermore, when cognizing an idea with the intellect, there arises in a monk
what is agreeable, what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He discerns
that 'This agreeable thing has arisen in me, this disagreeable thing... this agreeable
& disagreeable thing has arisen in me. And that is compounded, gross, dependently
co-arisen. But this is peaceful, this is exquisite, i.e., equanimity. With that,
the arisen agreeable thing... disagreeable thing... agreeable & disagreeable thing
ceases, and equanimity takes its stance. Just as a strong man might let two or three
drops of water fall onto an iron pan
heated all day: Slow would be the falling of the drops of water, but they quickly
would vanish & disappear. That is how quickly, how rapidly, how easily, no matter
what it refers to, the arisen agreeable thing... disagreeable thing... agreeable
& disagreeable thing ceases, and equanimity takes its stance. In the discipline
of the noble ones, this is called the unexcelled development of the faculties with
regard to ideas cognizable by the intellect. [§60]
And how is one a person in training, someone following the way? There is the
case where, when seeing a form with the eye, there arises in a monk what is agreeable,
what is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. He feels horrified, humiliated,
& disgusted with the arisen agreeable thing... disagreeable thing... agreeable &
disagreeable thing. (Similarly with the other senses.)...
And how is one a noble one with developed faculties? There is the case where,
when seeing a form with the eye, there arises in a monk what is agreeable, what
is disagreeable, what is agreeable & disagreeable. If he wants, he remains percipient
of loathsomeness in the presence of what is not
loathsome. If he wants, he remains percipient of unloathsomeness in the presence
of what is loathsome. If he wants, he remains percipient of loathsomeness in the
presence of what is not loathsome & what is. If he wants, he remains percipient
of unloathsomeness in the presence of what is loathsome & what is not. If he wants
— in the presence of what is loathsome & what is not — cutting himself off from
both, he remains equanimous, alert, & mindful. (Similarly with the other senses.)
[§§45-46; 98]
This is how one is a noble one with developed faculties. — MN 152
§ 182. [On attaining the fourth
level of jhana] there remains only equanimity: pure & bright, pliant, malleable
& luminous. Just as if a skilled goldsmith
or goldsmith's apprentice were to prepare a furnace, heat up a crucible, and, taking
gold with a pair of tongs, place it in the crucible. He would blow on it periodically,
sprinkle water on it periodically, examine it periodically, so that the gold would
become refined, well-refined, thoroughly refined, flawless, free from dross, pliant,
malleable & luminous. Then whatever sort of ornament he had in mind — whether a
belt, an earring, a necklace, or a gold chain — it would serve his purpose. In the
same way, there remains only equanimity: pure & bright, pliant, malleable, & luminous.
He [the meditator] discerns that 'If I were to direct equanimity as pure & bright
as this toward the dimension of the infinitude of space, I would develop the mind
along those lines, and thus this equanimity of mine — thus supported, thus sustained
— would last for a long time. (Similarly with the spheres of the infinitude of consciousness,
nothingness, & neither perception nor non-perception.)'
He discerns that 'If I were to direct equanimity as pure & bright as this toward
the dimension of the infinitude of space and to develop the mind along those lines,
that would be fabricated. (Similarly with the spheres of the infinitude of consciousness,
nothingness, & neither perception nor non-perception.)' He neither fabricates nor
wills for the sake of becoming or un-becoming. This being the case, he is not sustained
by anything in the world (does not cling to anything in the world). Unsustained,
he is not agitated. Unagitated, he is totally unbound right within. He discerns
that 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further
for this world.' — MN 140
§ 183. A person who is not
truly good... enters & remains in the first jhana. He notices, 'I have gained the
attainment of the first jhana, but these other monks have not gained the attainment
of the first jhana.' He exalts himself for the attainment of the first jhana and
disparages others. This is the quality of a person who is not truly good.
The truly good person notices, 'The Blessed One has spoken of
non-fashioning even with regard to the
attainment of the first jhana, for however they construe it, it becomes otherwise.'
So, making non-fashioning his focal point, he neither exalts himself for the attainment
of the first jhana nor disparages others. This is the quality of a person who is
truly good.
(Similarly with the other levels of jhana up through the dimension of nothingness.)
A person who is not truly good... enters & remains in the dimension of neither
perception nor non-perception. He notices, 'I have gained the attainment of the
dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, but these other monks have not
gained the attainment of the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception.'
He exalts himself for the attainment of the dimension of neither perception nor
non-perception and disparages others. This is the quality of a person who is not
truly good.
The truly good person notices, 'The Blessed One has spoken of non-fashioning
even with regard to the attainment of the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception,
for however they construe it, it becomes otherwise.' So, making non-fashioning his
focal point, he neither exalts himself for the attainment of the dimension of neither
perception nor non-perception nor disparages others. This is the quality of a person
who is truly good.
The truly good person, completely transcending the dimension of neither perception
nor non-perception, enters & remains in the cessation of feeling & perception. When
he sees with discernment, his effluents are ended. This is a monk who does not construe
anything, does not construe anywhere, does not construe in any way. — MN 113
Suggested Further Reading
Abbreviations
|
Source:
Copyright © 1996 Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Excerpted from Wings
to Awakening Part III from Access to
Insight edition © 1996 For free distribution. This work may be
republished, reformatted, reprinted, and redistributed in any
medium. It is the author's wish, however, that any such
republication and redistribution be made available to the public
on a free and unrestricted basis and that translations and other
derivative works be clearly marked as such. |
|
|